Apple Pal may be the second M1 moment – the new Apple Pal Silicon, in this case the C1 modem, the 5G modem of Qualcomm, at least some matrix, is beating the silicone to replace it. Okla, the company behind the popular Speedtest Service, has published a report that compares 5G motion between the iPhone 16 (Snapdragon X71 modem) and the new iPhone 16E (Apple Pal C1).
In summary, the Qualcomm modem offers high top speed, but in cases where the network speed was slow, C1 did better. OK Cla’s test The top 3 carriers, AT&T, T-Mobile and Verizon are covered, but here are the overall charts.
Among users experiencing poor network speed, 10th percent of all tests, 16e 27.35 Mbps Vs. Look at 16 with 16.66 Mbps. It also has some benefit in the middle test. It is only in the 90th percentile-when the Qualcomm-based phone comes on top of the high speed connections.
Here is a per-career breakdown, which shows that in the case of weak network connectivity, the iPhone 16E forwards the iPhone 16 throughout the board.
However, when the network speed is good, the iPhone 16 turns the tables on 16E:
Apple Pal is working on the type of C1 with MMWave connectivity, but the lack of fast 5G taste has not hurt the iPhone 16E much. MMWave Coverage U.S. There is also a spotty and in some countries it does not exist. Instead, Okla’s results have identified the big issue for the C1 modem.
T-Mobile users have the highest downlink speed as they have iPhone 16 or 16E. However, in T-Mobile Subscribers, people with 16E got significantly lower pace than the iPhone 16. Okala is attributed to the better deployment of T-Mobile’s nationwide rollout of 5G standalone (SA) and conductor consolidation (CA).
There are no official figures for X71, but the mid-range modems of Qualcomm support 4-link CA for download, while the C1 comes to the top. Interestingly, the modems of Qualcomm also support Pronunciation Conductor consolidation, while C1 is not. And yet see the results of the upload motion in all three carriers – the iPhone 16e beats its president brother -in -law.
This is the impressive first outing for Apple Pal. In the future C1 versions and C2, the company should focus on improving 5G SA and carrier consolidation support, which should accelerate its high-final influence. MMWave support will be nice, but there will be no difference in many regions.
Apple Pal also claims that C1 is the most efficient 5G modem that has been used on the iPhone yet. The iPhone 16E officially runs 21 hours of video streaming, while the iPhone 16 18 hours lasts. This is with a large battery (4,005 mAh vs. 3,561 mAh), though. And to be justified for Qualcomm, X71 is older than the company’s current modems.
This is not the whole story – Okla says she is working on a more detailed report that compares the entire iPhone 16 series. This report ends with a harasser – apparently, the iPhone 16 Pro Max defeats 16E in the “Most Performance Matrix”. Pro Max uses the same X71 modem, so the difference comes from elsewhere (antenna, maybe?).
Original
